DreamFace

  • AI Tools
  • Template
  • Blog
  • Pricing
  • API
En
    Language
  • English
  • 简体中文
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • 日本語
  • 한국어
  • Deutsch
  • Français
  • Русский
  • Português
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • ไทย
  • Tiếng Việt
  • Italiano
  • العربية
  • Nederlands
  • Svenska
  • Polski
  • Dansk
  • Suomi
  • Norsk
  • हिंदी
  • বাংলা
  • اردو
  • Türkçe
  • فارسی
  • ਪੰਜਾਬੀ
  • తెలుగు
  • मराठी
  • Kiswahili
  • Ελληνικά

Nano Banana vs GPT-4o: Who Leads the Next Wave of Image Creation?

By Ella 一  Sep 16, 2025
  • Nano Banana
  • GPT-4o

The frontier of AI image creation is no longer about whether AI can “draw.” It’s about whether AI can understand, adapt, and collaborate with human creativity. Google’s Nano Banana and OpenAI’s GPT-4o represent two distinct approaches: Nano Banana emphasizes deep contextual reasoning and realism, while GPT-4o delivers speed, versatility, and multimodal fluency.

To illustrate these differences, we tested both models using the same creative prompts. The results reveal not just their technical capabilities, but also their underlying design philosophies.



Case 1: Cute and Cozy Knitted Doll

Prompt (shared): A close-up, professionally composed photo of a hand-crocheted chibi doll based on a reference character image, held in two hands, with warm indoor lighting and blurred background.

nano-banana-vs-gpt-4o-1.webp

  • Nano Banana: Nano Banana re-creates the scene with meticulous textile fidelity. Yarn textures look tangible, shadows between stitches are naturally rendered, and the transition between skin and fabric feels lifelike. It recalculates lighting from the blurred window, giving the whole composition a cozy, handcrafted authenticity.
  • GPT-4o: GPT-4o delivers the doll with bright, appealing chibi proportions and strong character resemblance. Its result feels more stylized, with slightly less micro-detail in the yarn or hand textures. However, GPT-4o’s strength is its adaptability — with a few tweaks, the same doll can be instantly rendered in pixel art, plush toy, or painterly style.

👉 Comparison Insight: Nano Banana excels in realism and atmosphere, while GPT-4o offers style diversity and fast iteration.



Case 2: Bobblehead Generator from a Selfie

Prompt (shared): Transform a selfie into a bobblehead — enlarge the head slightly, keep the face accurate, cartoonify the body, and place it on a bookshelf.

nano-banana-vs-gpt-4o-2.webp

  • Nano Banana: Using its 3D spatial reasoning, Nano Banana creates a bobblehead that maintains accurate facial proportions, natural lighting, and seamless integration with the bookshelf environment. Shadows and reflections make the figure look like a physical collectible.
  • GPT-4o: GPT-4o quickly produces a charming bobblehead with exaggerated, cartoonish proportions. It prioritizes expressiveness over strict realism, making the output playful and customizable. With its editing tools, repositioning the figure or placing multiple bobbleheads in the same scene is effortless.

👉 Comparison Insight: Nano Banana is better for product-grade realism, while GPT-4o shines in speed and playful experimentation.



Case 3: Three Animals Selfie at a Landmark

Prompt (shared): A close-up selfie of three animals (e.g., cat, dog, rabbit) with different expressions in front of a landmark at golden hour, realistic cartoon style, 1:1 aspect ratio.

nano-banana-vs-gpt-4o-3.webp

  • Nano Banana: Nano Banana captures the golden-hour glow with photographic precision. Each animal’s fur reflects soft light naturally, while the landmark in the background is crisp yet properly blurred to suggest depth of field. Expressions look authentic and subtly integrated into the scene.
  • GPT-4o: GPT-4o generates a lively, cinematic cartoon composition, giving each animal highly expressive personalities — joy, surprise, calm — with bold detail. The landmark is faithfully rendered, and the system makes it easy to swap settings or animal types in seconds.

👉 Comparison Insight: Nano Banana leads in light realism and composition coherence, while GPT-4o dominates in expressive range and creative flexibility.



Conclusion

The same prompts reveal two different creative philosophies:

  • Nano Banana : Best for creators seeking realism, lighting accuracy, and context-aware collaboration. It feels like working with a creative partner who carefully preserves atmosphere and physical logic.
  • GPT-4o: Best for those needing speed, stylistic variety, and multimodal adaptability. It acts like a flexible studio assistant, rapidly generating diverse iterations.

So, who leads the next wave of image creation? The answer depends on the creator’s needs: Nano Banana for authenticity and consistency, GPT-4o for exploration and speed.

Back to Top
  • X
  • Youtube
  • Discord